Articles

Post-lockdown respiratory virus epidemiology: a monocentric observational study

ABSTRACT
During the 2020 lockdown and post-lockdown, we assisted in almost zeroing respiratory infections. This study aimed to describe the first epidemic of respiratory viruses after the easing of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for the containment of COVID-19 in a pediatric cohort of patients.
All children consecutively hospitalized because of a respiratory infection at our department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pediatric Respiratory and Cystic Fibrosis Unit – San Marco University Hospital in Catania, Italy, from October 1st, 2021, to March 15th, 2022 were tested for respiratory viruses. Among these patients, in the subgroup of children with bronchiolitis, we investigated the following endpoints: the etiology, the mean duration of hospitalization (mean ± SD), the severity of the disease (Clinical Respiratory Score), and the respiratory support provided (HFNC or Helmet-CPAP). For statistical analysis, SPSS 28.0.1.1 (14) software was used. A 2-tailed t-test for unpaired data was applied to compare the mean duration of hospitalization and need for ventilation, and a chi-square test was applied to relate the severity of viruses.
A total of 138 children were included in the study. The infection of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) was the most frequently observed (23.2%), followed by Bocavirus (10.87%), Rhinovirus (hRV) (4.38%), Parainfluenza virus (2.9%), Enterovirus (2.17%), endemic Coronavirus (1.45%) and Metapneumovirus (1.45%). 53.6% of patients resulted negative. Of the 138 children, 62 (45%) had a diagnosis of bronchiolitis: in 40% of these children, we isolated RSV, in 8% Bocavirus, in 3.23% Rhinovirus, in 3.3% Parainfluenza virus, 1.61% endemic Coronavirus and Metapneumovirus. In the remaining 42% of patients with bronchiolitis, no viruses were isolated by nasal swabs. The mean duration of hospitalization for RSV-related bronchiolitis (mean 9.48 days ± SD 3.95) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the non-RSV-related bronchiolitis (mean 7.22 days ± SD 3.7). According to the clinical respiratory score, RSV-related bronchiolitis resulted in more severe (p < 0.05) than non-RSV ones, and consequently, it has been associated with a higher risk (p < 0.05) of being subject to ventilation either with helmet CPAP or HFNC.
During the considered period, RSV was the most widespread respiratory virus, in fact it has been isolated through nasal swab in the 23.2% of the whole study group of 138 patients). RSV was responsible for the most severe bronchiolitis cases, associated with a higher hospitalization length and a more severe disease compared to non-RSV-related bronchiolitis.

ABBREVIATIONS
RSV: respiratory syncytial virus; NPIs: nonpharmaceutical interventions; CRS: clinical respiratory score; HFNC: High Flow Nasal Cannula.

HIGHLIGHTS BOX
What is already known about this topic? During the 2020 lockdown and post-lockdown, we assisted in almost zeroing respiratory infections, probably due to the containment measures adopted (e.g., hand hygiene measures, social distancing, and the use of face masks). What does this article add to our knowledge? During the considered period, RSV was the most widespread respiratory virus responsible for the most severe bronchiolitis cases, associated with a higher hospitalization length and a more severe disease compared to non-RSV-related bronchiolitis. How does this study impact current management guidelines? It is recommended to particularly monitoring patients with bronchiolitis related to RSV since the disease has a more severe course than bronchiolitis related to other respiratory viruses. Since bronchiolitis related to RSV has a more sever course than bronchiolitis related to other respiratory viruses, it is recommended to strictly monitor especially patients with RSV.


Received
: Sept 5, 2022
Accepted: Oct 10, 2022
Published: Nov 1, 2022

Table of Contents: Vol. 1, n. 0, November 2022

Remember that the download is free only for personal use. If you want to utilize articles for large distribution, please contact us at editorialoffice@pediatric-respiratory-journal.com